Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] rculist: introduce list_next_or_null_rr_rcu()

Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) The whole chain to look up the pointer you are taking 'next' of needs to be under RCU, and that's not clear from your example. 'next' of needs to be under RCU, and that's not clear from your example. The above is (as Paul said) true of list_next_rcu() too, so it's not like this is anything specific to the 'rr' version.
this is anything specific to the 'rr' version.
Linus
Linus
Linus