Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) Maybe even a L1 I$ that is
keyed by CPL.
keyed by CPL.
I think somebody inside of Intel needs to really take a long hard look at their CPU's, and actually admit that they have issues instead of writing PR blurbs that say that everything works as designed. Or is Intel basically saying "we are committed to selling you shit forever and ever, and never fixing anything"?
forever and ever, and never fixing anything"?
Because if that's the case, maybe we should start looking towards the ARM64 people more.
ARM64 people more.
Please talk to management. Because I really see exactly two possibibilities: - Intel never intends to fix anything
- Intel never intends to fix anything
OR
OR
- these workarounds should have a way to disable them.
keyed by CPL.
I think somebody inside of Intel needs to really take a long hard look at their CPU's, and actually admit that they have issues instead of writing PR blurbs that say that everything works as designed. Or is Intel basically saying "we are committed to selling you shit forever and ever, and never fixing anything"?
forever and ever, and never fixing anything"?
Because if that's the case, maybe we should start looking towards the ARM64 people more.
ARM64 people more.
Please talk to management. Because I really see exactly two possibibilities: - Intel never intends to fix anything
- Intel never intends to fix anything
OR
OR
- these workarounds should have a way to disable them.