Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) wrote:
The default shouldn't be about "best and most secure", but "most convenient, while still not actively *IN*secure" convenient, while still not actively *IN*secure" So "some servers require 3.0" may be true, but if it's also the case that "most servers still don't do 3.0 at all", then it's a "some" vs "most".
"most".
Which is the most common one? So in the meantime the only issue is what the right default should be without auto-negotiation.
right default should be without auto-negotiation.
So it should be about what the failure rate is.
[...]
and some servers require SMB3 minimum as a result,The default shouldn't be about "best and most secure", but "most convenient, while still not actively *IN*secure" convenient, while still not actively *IN*secure" So "some servers require 3.0" may be true, but if it's also the case that "most servers still don't do 3.0 at all", then it's a "some" vs "most".
"most".
Which is the most common one? So in the meantime the only issue is what the right default should be without auto-negotiation.
right default should be without auto-negotiation.
So it should be about what the failure rate is.