Linus Torvalds writes: (Summary) They are horrible for a
very simple reason: kernel behavior changes that depend on some subtle
boot difference are truly nasty to debug, and nasty to get coverage
for.
for.
And this "subtle boot difference" is really bad because it's a
for.
And this "subtle boot difference" is really bad because it's a
difference that has a particularly bad pattern: pretty much not a single mainline kernel developer will have secure boot enabled, exactly because it's so inconvenient for testing. won't unseal if someone's switched out the kernel) then it's reasonable for >